-
What is a reference to an Italian Egyptologist doing in Louisa May Alcotts portrait of domesticity Little Women? Why does Elizabeth Stuart Phelpss painter protagonist Avis Dobell know--and care--that her red shawl is dyed with desiccated beetles? Why might W.E.B. Du Boiss fictional sharecropper display a reproduction of a painting by William-Adolphe Bouguereau near his cotton field? These questions, and more, are answered by Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930. An interdisciplinary study of references to internationally-traded commodities in US fiction, Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 assembles an integrated geopolitical analysis of Americans material, gendered, and aesthetic experiences of empire at the turn of the twentieth century. Examining allusions to contested goods like cochineal, cotton, oranges, fur, gold, pearls, porcelain, and wheat, Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 reveals a linked global imagination among authors who were often directly or indirectly critical of US imperial ambitions. Furthermore, Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 considers the commodification of art itself, interpreting writers allusions to paintings, sculptures, and artists as self-aware acknowledgments of their own complicity in global capitalism. As Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 demonstrates, literary texts have long trained consumers to imagine their relationship to the world through the things they own.
What is a reference to an Italian Egyptologist doing in Louisa May Alcotts portrait of domesticity Little Women? Why does Elizabeth Stuart Phelpss painter protagonist Avis Dobell know--and care--that her red shawl is dyed with desiccated beetles? Why might W.E.B. Du Boiss fictional sharecropper display a reproduction of a painting by William-Adolphe Bouguereau near his cotton field? These questions, and more, are answered by Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930. An interdisciplinary study of references to internationally-traded commodities in US fiction, Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 assembles an integrated geopolitical analysis of Americans material, gendered, and aesthetic experiences of empire at the turn of the twentieth century. Examining allusions to contested goods like cochineal, cotton, oranges, fur, gold, pearls, porcelain, and wheat, Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 reveals a linked global imagination among authors who were often directly or indirectly critical of US imperial ambitions. Furthermore, Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 considers the commodification of art itself, interpreting writers allusions to paintings, sculptures, and artists as self-aware acknowledgments of their own complicity in global capitalism. As Consuming Empire in US Fiction, 18651930 demonstrates, literary texts have long trained consumers to imagine their relationship to the world through the things they own.