Your cart

Your cart is empty


Explore our range of products

Verso Books Paperback English

Democracy in the Political Present

A Queer-Feminist Theory

By Isabell Lorey

Regular price £17.99
Unit price
per

Verso Books Paperback English

Democracy in the Political Present

A Queer-Feminist Theory

By Isabell Lorey

Regular price £17.99
Unit price
per
 
Dispatched tomorrow with FREE Tracked Delivery
Delivery expected between Thursday, 9th July and Friday, 10th July
(0 in cart)
Apple Pay
Google Pay
Maestro
Mastercard
PayPal
Shop Pay
Visa

You may also like

  • ‘Presentist democracy is without a people and without nation. Rather than regimes of borders and migration, its borders are sexism and racism, homo- and transphobia, colonialism and extractivism.’<br><br>In the midst of the crises and threats to liberal democracy, Isabell Lorey develops a democracy in the present tense; one which breaks open political certainties and linear concepts of progress and growth. Her queer feminist political theory formulates a fundamental critique of masculinist concepts of the people, representation, institutions, and the multitude. In doing so, she unfolds an original concept of a presentist democracy based on care and interrelatedness, on the irreducibility of responsibilities—one which cannot be conceived of without social movements’ past struggles and current practices.
‘Presentist democracy is without a people and without nation. Rather than regimes of borders and migration, its borders are sexism and racism, homo- and transphobia, colonialism and extractivism.’<br><br>In the midst of the crises and threats to liberal democracy, Isabell Lorey develops a democracy in the present tense; one which breaks open political certainties and linear concepts of progress and growth. Her queer feminist political theory formulates a fundamental critique of masculinist concepts of the people, representation, institutions, and the multitude. In doing so, she unfolds an original concept of a presentist democracy based on care and interrelatedness, on the irreducibility of responsibilities—one which cannot be conceived of without social movements’ past struggles and current practices.